LIVING LIFE WELL


Like lightening is the mind that abide intent.
Vested intent the present abide in sense and
resonate in mutual relevance that manifest the 
the cocreative confluence we share regardless


Living life in harmony with nature's flow is entirely vested in the intent we share, in a sense of mutual relevance. The notion of deferring intent is as incomprehensible as choosing absence over presence. #nature #intent #harmony #mindfulness #awareness #presence

From a neurocognitive perspective, the concept of vested intent refers to the unpopular choice of a consciously driven executive faculty, as opposed to the trend of a habitual, automated, semiconscious awareness that usually dominates most of our daily routine.

Living life in harmony with nature's flow is entirely vested in the intent that we share, in a sense of mutual relevance. This is the only choice that offers any means of manifesting the present in a co-creative convergence. It raises a genuine concern about the prevailing view among scientists and researchers in the field. This view blatantly recommends a perspective that a subconscious executive function is 'better than,' based on its reliability, efficiency, and expediency. This assumption that it increases processing capacity and provides for a better level execute control by paying less attention to the present is a decidedly dubious choice when minding the purpose of intention.

To the casual observer, the benefits alluded to by 'those in the know' may seem plausible reasons to accept their recommendation without question. However, from a considered view, the notion of deferring intent is as incomprehensible as choosing absence over presence, preferring to believe instead of realizing the present intent or refuting the sense vested in mutual relevance.





I find it difficult to understand why the undeniable evidence of how and why matter manifests intent in dual entangled equal mirror opposite expression is considered dubious, unclear or inconclusive to anyone, let alone esteemed scientists who insist on smashing the matter we know with ever-increasing force to reveal smaller and smaller particles that behave according to well-known and established quantum principles. It is puzzling why anyone would doubt the nature of existence as we have repeatedly observed or questioned the unwavering evidence that matter manifests intent in dual entangled equal mirror opposite particles that form the fundamental building blocks of all matter.

However, the matter we know is still being smashed into infinitesimal small bits in large Hadron colliders at an exorbitant cost in the belief of finding evidence that refutes the undisputed proof they seemingly disbelieve.

It is surprising to me that the scientific evidence that supports the nature of entrainment or proves that matter manifests to intent entangled relevance may be considered contentious or ill-advised just because it defies convention or vexes a belief vested in a divine creator.

I feel obligated to mention that this belief is nothing more than a void of irrelevance and deluded conviction that fervently praises providence and reverently prays for an end to the suffering of their fealty. Meanwhile, the mutual abundance and bountiful splendor that reside in a present we share in the flow of Nature's co-creative confluence manifest regardless of the clear and present sense we share. Whether this will prove to be another epitaph to our sad legacy or turn out to be the spark that enlightens a global revelation remains to be seen.

Comments